Home | Journal | Conference | About | Contact   — The Literary London Journal —

<1> A dark, pessimistic and deeply questioning work, James Thomson's epic poem first appeared in 1874 and describes the poet's journey through one night of the 'doleful City' of London. The pilgrimage through the metropolis is presented allegorically and metaphorically as a series of disjointed movements through hopelessness and despair, which only the oblivion of death can end. It is a hymn to urban dystopia, a bleak critique of the finite human value of Victorian expansionism, and the antithesis of the redemptive pattern of Christian eschatology. In its relentless rhythms and claustrophobic imagery, Thomson's poem is one of the darkest visions of urban existence of the late-nineteenth century. City of Dreadful Night is a modern reworking of the Inferno by Dante (cited in the epigraph), but visually it recalls the apocalyptic canvases of John Martin (1789-1854), and later, the illustrations by Gustave Doré (1832-83) for London, A Pilgrimage published in 1872.

<2> England had been developing generally since the eighteenth century, with the building of cities, seaports, and regional centres, but London's growth was phenomenal. It had been growing since the Middle Ages, and there had always been areas of poverty, but the population growth in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries forced a reconceptualisation of the poor, as diseased, dangerous, and in need of containment. In his 'Report on the Sanitary Condition of the Labouring Population' of 1842, Edwin Chadwick described the 'various forms of epidemic, endemic and other disease' 'aggravated, or propagated' by the industrial working class. Thirty-two years later, Thomson was to extend the analogy between life and disease, writing of 'Infections of unutterable sadness,/ Infections of incalculable madness,/ Infections of incurable despair.' The massive migration of the rural population to urban centres revitalised the concept of the city, and as living conditions worsened and multiplied, the modern city and its characteristics inspired a whole literature. In the twentieth and twenty-first centuries the conception of the modern city as a waste land finds its most powerful expression in the work of T.S. Eliot, Patrick Hamilton, Martin Amis, Peter Ackroyd, Iain Sinclair, and more recently, Will Self.

<3> Thomson's poem, accompanied here by the black-and-white drawings of Clifford Harper, achieves an effect reminiscent of the 1872 collaboration between Blanchard Jerrold and Gustave Doré. London, A Pilgrimage was a social commentary on the poor, or what Jerrold, called 'that long disease, their life'. It was the product of a three-month stay in London, during which time Doré explored the city 'from cellars to attics'. His famous image, Over London by Rail, for example, represents what we don't usually see unless we travel by train. The backs of houses, compartmentalised, claustrophobic, and inescapable convey something of the routine entrapment of the working classes at the time. It is impossible to tell the time of day in this picture, and there is a sense of day merging into night, into day. It is a powerful image of the Victorian humdrum.

<4> Clifford Harper's illustrations for Thomson's work convey the same sense of monotony and inescapability, but his repeated depiction of anonymous human figures, isolated and caught in spaces which go nowhere and offer no release to a better place, intensify the ideas of hopelessness and despair. The bold contrasts, the dense, purposeful line, and the heavy, architectural sense of form are distinctive. They show evidence of Harper's debt to nineteenth-century French illustration, particularly the work of revolutionary Félix Vallotton, and to the English tradition of woodcuts and wood-engravings that includes Walter Crane, William Morris and Eric Gill, and that, indeed, goes back to the great Thomas Bewick himself. Vallotton's woodcuts and their narrative style, further developed by the Belgian artist Frans Masereel (1889-1972), are a particularly powerful inspiration for Harper, who has produced a powerful little book in the genre of Vallotton/Masereel about a First World War deserter shot for cowardice (The Unknown Deserter, Working Press, 1990). In addition, there have been numerous other publications, but most of his work has appeared in fairly obscure underground publications with tiny circulations. Over the past few years, however, Harper's work has been reaching a much wider audience, mainly due to his drawings for The Guardian, and his drawings for The Guardian's Country Diary in particular (Agraphia Press, 2003).

<5> The debt to the anarchist revolutionaries, Vallotton and Thomson, is not coincidental for Harper. In 1997, he produced his own designs for a set of postage stamps, which bore the heads of anarchists and sort-of anarchists, such as the Digger Gerrard Winstanley, William Godwin, Shelley, Proudhon ('property is theft'), Bakunin, Kropotkin, Oscar Wilde, Emma Goldman and Emiliano Zapata. Earlier this year, in April and May, an exhibition of Harper's drawings, entitled 'Graphic Anarchy', was held at the Newsroom Gallery, 60 Farringdon Road, EC1.

<6> In a recent article in The Guardian (Saturday, 19 April 2003), Richard Boston has commented on the unusual graphic technique of Harper that simulates the processes and practice of wood-cuts and wood-engravings. Artists making woodcuts traditionally use the side grain, often of apple wood, while wood-engravers use the end grain of an extremely hard wood, usually box wood or yew. Boston reveals that Harper does not use wood at all and nor does he make prints:

He is self-taught and, anarchist that he is, has come up with something of his very own. He draws on CS1O Line Board with black ink and a Rotring Rapidograph pen with either a .01 or .03 nib. Lines and cross-hatching are scratched into the black with an Edding scalpel. The result is finer than scraper-board (a most unsympathetic medium, in my view) and is made finer still by being reduced in reproduction; Harper usually works about one-third up on what will be the finished work. So, in the end, it is a printed work after all. It's just that in this case the printing is not done by the artist but by the newspaper or magazine for which it has been executed.